Why is Hollywood a frighteningly similar to the United States Agency for International Development?
Brady Corbit was not rich in making “brutal science”.
The Oscar -nominated film received only $ 31 million in the world, and the author/director claims He did not receive a single fils to create the drama.
Let’s put Hollywood accounting aside.
Make a “brutal” cortup for About 10 million dollars. This is not necessarily impressive unless you watch the movie. It is great, epic in the sense of the old school is full of amazing performance and luxurious landscapes.
Make Corbit every number of piasters. It is an exception from the base.
This is why Hollywood carries an uncomfortable similarity with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which is now a synonym for waste thanks to Team Doge.
Looking at “Wolf Man”, the last attempt to revive the classic horror movie. The January version was shown at the box office, but a look at the film indicates that its cost should be less than “The Broutalist”.
Better.
The film is first placed in a cabin in the forest, with other scenes in the forest. FX slim, at the very least, and the only name in the actors is Julia Garner of “Ozark”.
The reported budget stands in $ 25 million. Where did the money go?
“Wolf Man” compared “Godzilla Minus Zero”, the arrival of the sudden box office for 2023. This film cost less than $ 15 million and has all the bells and lamps of Hollywood films.
The same is the “creator”. Tenting the box office 2023 is fertile like any MCU, but it carried an earthen price (according to the standards of Tinsel Town) $ 80 million.
“I am a little embarrassing, but it was $ 80 million.” [director Gareth] Edwards tells various. “We must do it for less.”
Meanwhile, critics give up FX “humiliation Behind “Captain America: Brave New World”, a movie that can cost Disney Up to $ 380 million after a large -scale reshaping.
These amazing numbers cannot help bring the financial story. The Federal Agency, which was established by President John Kennedy to address international poverty and encourage democracy all over the world, suffers from fire from President Donald Trump’s accountants.
The informal government efficiency Ministry withdrew the Curtain of the American Agency for International Development, and what we see is not beautiful.
We can make fun of extremist examples from the American Agency for International Development, such as: “7.9 million dollars for the project This would teach Sri Lankan journalists to avoid “dual sex language”.
It is better to focus on More tangible criticism, Likewise:
The President of El Salvador also imposed it, “Most governments do not want to flow the US Agency for International Development to their countries because they understand where many of this money ends … at best, 10 percent of the money may reach real projects that help people In need … this alleged aid is not only useful for the United States; it is also a great victory for the rest of the world.
Both the American Agency for International Development and Hollywood are doing some good works.
The former helps people in remote lands, echoing America’s generous spirit. Millions enjoy the best Hollywood product, from dazzling films such as “Dune” to TV -based Escapism (“The Bear”, “Landman” and much more).
Each of them should prevail in their high spending and waste cut for long -term feasibility.
President Trump Illon Musk cost the US Agency for International Development and similar government programs. Perhaps Hollywood studios should use visions like Corbet, Edwards and “Godzilla Minus One” Takashi Yamazaki to do the same for them.
