» Trudeau has become successful as a progressive, but serves the interests of big business

Legislative action has been halted in the Canadian Parliament, which will be suspended until Mars. The delay in legislative action actually corresponds to the specific date set by the Liberal Party to choose the chief chef who will replace Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who announced that leave will replace the chosen corona.

As the political agitation continues, Canada’s fortunes continue to be donated with joy. The benefits for companies extend to borders. In 2022, interest earned in Canada will be C$275 billion higher than in 2019. Interest in 2022 has not risen much since Canada has existed. Even if the situation does not persist in 2024, Canada’s main stock exchange, the S&P/TSX Composite Index, has advanced 18% on a recent year basis, in addition to achieving various record highs for moments of the year.

Canada’s most important sectors have made significant financial gains since 2015, when Trudeau entered the business. Bank interest tends to increase. For example, the Royal Bank’s 2023 benefit will reach a record level, reaching $16.24 billion, or 62.4% of 2015. The oil and gas sector’s net benefit of $11.8 billion in 2014 has become $63.1 billion. Dollars in 2022 and will benefit from new primary funding for public authorities, without building up to an amount exceeding $34 billion for Canadians. Benefits of insurance companies include records. Telecom benefits reach a record high in 2022. Vous l’aurez includes…

The PDG moves on the ground. In 2024, Canada’s top 100 paid PDGs earned a minimum of $13.2 million. After 2021 and 2022, third-day bonuses will be at an all-time high.

Well, this accumulation of wealth is reflected in: the number of visits to food banks, the housing crisis that exists in all cities of Canada (a crisis that, everywhere, leads to death and amputation), the inequality of returns without precedent. Canada 2025 is in a delicate and precise position. The genders on the raid cord.

While we cannot attribute to the politician himself the merit or responsibility for the current situation, there is no doubt that federal government policy plays an important role in reducing or worsening revenue inequality. Fact: Justin Trudeau largely serves the interests of corporations and their mentors.

That’s why, when the media and big business analysts assert that Trudeau has given up on who he was, it’s his grave in his chair: why is he talking?

The details that made this statement valid for the purpose of parlé sous le couvert de l’anonymat. David Akin of Global News stated: “Ask all MPs with Global News to consider that Trudeau will replace the Grand Party and change its key role in the liberalization rollback. » There’s no point in saying that I don’t comment on any advanced information « the gauche. »

Is it possible to have a Prime Minister who is not on a mission to highlight record corporate performance and worsening social inequality as “grossly exaggerated”? What kind of doctrine supports extreme income inequality and a financial structure that cannot redistribute benefits?

It may not be logical for people to think that Trudeau’s economic policy was a doozy. If it’s not true, the atmosphere with Trudeau was very awkward. Since he started the job, Trudeau has become woven into manual language, but it is nothing more than practical language. Rappelez-vous son Fameux moment oùù, après qu’un The journalist who requested that the Cabinet contain an equal number of women and men, it was announced: «Parce qu’on est en 2015». Bockwap concluded that Trudeau’s response suggested she was feminine, unlike the former prime minister, who flirts with anti-abortion militants and would likely hold back and agonize over a piece representing radical feminists. comprehensive.

But Trudeau’s politics are no longer particularly feminist. And when the first attorney general, Jody Wilson-Raybould, who was fired, was a good feminist, she was overlooked. Confronting him, Wilson-Raybould painted a picture of a man who was not entirely feminine.

Ideas may be left at certain times, but they are not enough to support political systems. Regarding participating in gay pride or fighting for the Black Lives Matter movement, Trudeau’s government policy does not make it in the passion, and there are many of us who would not happen voir clair dans tout cela.

In fact, the government did not announce its single major victory: the Canadian Child Allotment. This means allowing hundreds of thousands of children to immediately move out of poverty. These Canadians provide an additional income of $648.91 per month per 6-year-old child. However, taking into account the most important social pressures, this guarantee is not enough: increasing child poverty during the post-pandemic period.

On the other hand, Trudeau’s big promises were very good and very encouraging. The free medicines guarantee system does not cover the moment when two medicines have not appeared and are not renewed, and it has been canceled under provincial agreements. Their new dental system is no longer fully functional, but when it is, it does not help Canadians with poor revenue, resources or necessary access for the beneficiary. International orchards are excellent, if you enjoy the opportunity to be in a garden that operates as part of the program (this is not the case at the top of some of them), but they also like the same thing.

Amending the tax code to get a tax benefit won’t make it to the City Council vote — and if it’s not adopted before the election, it will fail the water. Promises to amend the electoral system or bring about real changes in the labor market through the tape were diminished.

In addition to the pandemic proposals, without the need for the significant financial aid created by the Trudeau government (in fact, it sets the social program as well as the story of Canada’s history on Lending Day), it is highlighted after it appears that the program has clearly turned into a huge transfer. From public funds to private funds, large companies became the main companies. Poor Canadians receive no money. Canadians who earned more than $5,000, and who lost wages due to the pandemic, will receive a monthly allotment that limits hundreds of billions each from repayments, and small businesses cannot be reimbursed for loans made in the chaos. carried out by the company.

The cynicism surrounding these programs is the silent carburetor that fuels the campaign that leads to Trudeau’s waterfall. However, even if charter companies such as telecommunications companies, and even some long-standing institutions that run a lot of mystery in these institutions, will receive millions of dollars in funds to help with the epidemic, no formalities.

These measures are the reason for Trudeau’s popularity. As a result, emotions dissipate, and people realize that their government does not really begrudge them their help. Although there are not many options to help the many Canadians who choose to support Conservative Party chef Pierre Poilievre, they have turned to improving Conservative competence in order to reduce poverty or help ordinary people.

The major public media outlets have featured a large number of progressive journalists and commentators. A world has been created out of this that is defined by law, and is generally a caricature of really stupid policies.

The fact that Trudeau holds a position where qualified “progressive” journalists do not allow Canadians to think seriously and reliably about progressive politics. Instead, public journalists encourage the world’s representatives, their party budgets and their loyal chefs: “Oh, the problem is, that’s just the way it is. »

Well, there’s nothing real. And what should we care about when preparing potential people to also be a good fit for the business world so that the precedent is set?