Actor Noel Clark described a woman who claimed to have suggested her sex at a dinner party as “fictional” while he presented evidence of the trial of the Supreme Court defaming against the guardian.
Clark is sued Guardian News and Media (GNM) on seven articles and podcasts, including an article in April 2021 that 20 women knowing professionally have made allegations of misconduct.
It deny these allegations, while GNM defends its reports as real and in the public interest.
Gavin Milat KC told Clark on Tuesday that the woman, known as “Imogen”, wrote on the Internet the day after dinner at Soho House in 2014, which gave a description of what happened.
He said: “I told her what she wanted to do for her, completely picnic. After dinner, when she says goodbye to the street, she embraced her and tried to kiss her on the lips. She turned her head away and got the cross.”
Clark denied that the 19 -year -old was asking about sex and said he did not try to kiss her.
He told the court: “On my children, this is not what happened at our dinner, and it is a fiction because this is what you do. It is in the rights of women, which I do not knock, I used to be so.
It is clear that she wrote it for women who go to these things. I can stand on it and die with it. I know it is not real. “
In the statement of the witnesses, he said that he remembers Emojin, who is a “conversation of Ghazli and suggestive”, and that she took his glasses and took a comment on his secretary.
He added: “She did not seem uncomfortable or afraid at all, and it seems that she was completely interacting and encouraging this spinning behavior.”
Milar Clark showed some text from the chat in which the actor later told one of their colleagues that he suggested imogen at dinner.
“When I said” certainly no, “Mila Milar said.
Clark said: “Well, I think she was flirting first.
“It was not true because I suggested it after I invaded me. I invaded with me first and then continued to flirt with.”
Clark also said that another woman talking to the guardian about his alleged sexual misconduct was “frightening things” and “terrifying”.
He said, “I didn’t want her to talk to journalists. I don’t understand why this is a problem.
“I believe in the article, to balance, they said two things or two things about me before my life was destroyed.”
Clark tells the court that he is “not a leader of worship”
Gina Powell, who worked for the indispensable company Clark from 2014 to 2017, claims that Clark was exposed to it in a car, and sexually assaulted it while they were on a business trip to Los Angeles.
Later in the session on Tuesday, Milar said she was young in the work relationship and was trying to “be part of the family.”
“Did you know that she thought about leaving this relationship like leaving worship?” Clark later asked.
Clark replied: “Wow, I am a worship leader now. This is getting more and more anger. I am not a worship leader.”
He continued: “She was more than happy to participate in these talks.
“I am not trying to attack anyone. I am trying to defend my position. Those people who say these things are also involved in these things.”
In a statement of witnesses, Clark said that Powell asked about going to the nudity club on the Los Angeles trip and will send links to pornography.
Powell “Tles” “several times” also claims a different trip to Edinburgh.
When Milar was asked how to define him, Clark raised his hands in front of his chest, and he published his fingers and said: “Pressing my hall, touching.
“If you embrace someone and tend to someone below, I assume that this is tired.”
He also denied Powell that she had “Volkswagen vaginal”, adding: “I don’t even know what to do so.”
The trial in London will only deal with responsibility and not evaluate any damage. Clark wants to increase his demand for special damage to more than 70 million pounds, and he also wants to submit a claim about allegations that many people conspired against him using allegations fabricated with misconduct or sexual assault.
For Clark, Philip Williams, the court previously informed in written shows that the actor “has clearly demonstrated the falsehood of all allegations.”
The lawyer continued that his client “is barely able to respond to the allegations” published by the Guardian and was “seen as a criminal by all those who have been trusted in the past and worked with him.”
In his written shows, Milar said that the paper “did not simply accept what was said” and that “a lot of time and resources devoted to reaching the truth.”
He also said that there is “many evidence” that all articles were largely correct or correct.
Listening to Mrs. Justice Stein is scheduled to conclude in April, with a written decision at a later time.
Email pi***@pr**********.uk To refer to errors, give the story tips or send a message to publish on the “Letters Page” blog
