L’eurodéputée Chloe Riedel, an ideal model for contemporary socialists – IREF Europe

It has been said a lot in these times that the social network The end of the week, and voilà que je tombe directement sur un tweet From the european PS Chloé Ridel we are happy with the basics and ideals of the text that we read in the same way as the security provided. With approximations, ambiguities, and practical omissions, it’s hard to do better!

First note, it seems that Mme Ridel no longer wants to publish anything at all into the world at all, which is what the social network wants as stated, and that’s very good. On the other hand, I am not very involved with any of the economic and political areas, but rather I mean to reclaim the heart and reject the ban on X, as the new Minister of Foreign Affairs and all. I don’t monopolize ideas on social networks, I prefer everything simply, and everything natural in a democracy, I answer.

Chloe Riedel alerts a world that she is entitled to “emancipation” in public services subject to privacy and the state due to a very simple expression. They reason that this configuration may lead to the people losing democratic control over all parts of their existence. This is what actually happened in the world of technological progress, thanks to this measure, there are a few billionaires from Silicon Valley who have decided which research sectors to invest their money in. The democratic spirit is directed towards the search for vital sobriety, for example; Well, it’s not easy for Elon Musk to be interested in Mars! It can be developed Neuralink ! This is the fastest way to move, and it tells you the type of forces you have in your argent!

It is always a miracle to see that the three great political reflections of the socialists have not developed even one iota after Marx. To start, the root enemy, these are financial forces, such as disaient Mitterrand Holland. In a century, Daladier has since been revealed “Dux Cent Family” Come on “Women of the French Economy and, indeed, of French Politics.” The proposal is a kind of internationalization as far as California, but it is always better to share the fortunes against the working masses for whom socialists work so insufferably.

The second aspect, which deconstructs the logic of the precedent, lies in Cape Verde which does not allow the socialists to agree to any proposal. It is sensitive to the argent (when it comes to the rescue, as soon as the Reclaim plus benefits For the sake of their good deeds), their projects force them to continue and fail to avoid the desperate black spirit of commerce that cannot slow down and immediately slow down a uniquely possible path of victorious humanity.

Insofar as it is a triple reflex, which also reveals prior reasoning, this is the minimum possibility of choice. Socialist projects exist by definition, but no other option can be superior. It is too much justice, too much solidarity, too much kind, too much intelligence, too much art, too much democracy (and so on, after the project has been considered) without reflecting what former socialism was like for people. Or Elon Musk and company are curious about their singing, without asking Chloe Riedel. Kale scandal!

This last step has its reason as it gives us great terror in our newfound horror, but we have a part of nature to bring a fiery bonfire such as irony: imagine that the public service Pôle uses it entirely to replace it with the private professional social network LinkedIn…

Who finds that we have others, in France, who have the opportunity of living under an extensive private state, perhaps the most extensive in the world, in numbers of personnel, in public expenditures, in obligatory advances, in rules, etc., systems and agencies of government, etc. that. We have residents in special places in order to accurately measure the benefits of “citizens.” Also, I ask the question: Are there a large number of people who shamelessly assert that Paul uses useful tools to find a job? That this is certain, that is, it is the fault of all public services, France has a bright color 7,4%While the people who don’t care about the company’s work, have France travel, are in it. 4,1%.

Likewise, what could seriously confirm that our public services were not limited to scientific research and technological projects? To name but a few, the detainees that provide the arithmetic plan, the small aerodrome, the current Notre-Dame-de-Landes aerodrome, and all the difficulties in strategic judgment surrounding the (length) that arises from the EPR at Flamanville. Although this is the first time the services requested by the French state in 1994 have been called for resident Internet capabilities are the latest “It is not certain that, in the long run, everything will constitute the global road network.”

Brave. To continue to review all our public monopolist services, from the hospital to the school and to the university To the employee, and this will also help you find the main text message: Instant results. Does the election allow you to change what is the case in this situation, like Chloe Riedel, like to think? No, and this is for two big reasons that complement two concepts: consent and risk reward (meaning “skin in the game”).

French public services are an example of organizations that operate without the help of agreement, being distributed to improve their offer. Furthermore, their agents hold the title for the bulk of employment in their lives, depending on the money they do not show up, A perfect formula to provide better service at a discounted price. It is a guarantee because this is that the money (taxes and taxes) will be a misapplication. An enhanced fact of the relationship with the Court of Accounts, including this celui On January 9, an extraordinary list of financial aid was released that goes on endlessly and without reason.

In the absence of agreement, and in the absence of risk faced by diverse economic, scientific, educational, health and/or cultural actors, notions of social existence remain in control of both the actor itself, the state. The possibility of choosing between profit from one school, one hospital, one research, one redirection system, etc., in our societies that are not free of citizens, and more than users it is only good to accept what the administration wants well we agree : du chômage , but in demand ; Medical benefits and medicines, but “free”, are available and accessible; Diplomas are of little value and more accessible. Do you have control? Ô Combine!