The Minister of Health at Alberta says it contains a “wide range of views” – consisting of healthcare professionals, academics, researchers and advisers, and its recommendations are presenting a perspective about how the government can be in a better position to protect the health and safety of the people of the future Alberta.
Critics describe it as a “sad document – lacking a great deal of credibility”, and it is a document “that takes a lot of information completely outside its context.”
On Friday afternoon (January 24, 2025), the Alberta government quietly released The work team report that evaluated the boycott response to the Coffee-19 epidemic.
The report was prepared – with a budget of $ 2 million – shortly after Daniel Smith’s arrival in power in late 2022, and promised to treat the grievances of its supporters due to the Corona virus.
Alberta Prime Minister Daniel Smith has arrived in power, promised to treat the united Communist Party members due to the Corona virus.
Global news
The work team was headed by Dr. Gary Davidson, the former head of emergency medicine at Red Deir Hospital, who accused the boycott, during the peak of the epidemic, of exaggerating the impact of the Coveyd-19, saying that the number of hospital entry cases-is tampered with to justify public health restrictions.
Smith defended the appointment of Davidson, saying that she wanted to listen to a wide range of views, including those that were “underestimated in the public domain.”
Among the other dozens of members of the work team, Dr. Jae Bhahataria, an explicit critic of America’s policies related to the Coffee-19, chosen by President Donald Trump to manage the American National Health Institute.
But Dr. Brian Konway, medical director of the Vancouver Center for Infectious Diseases, criticized the document, saying: “This is a report written by individuals who had a clear agenda, and they did not want to be subject to a review of the peers.”
“Dina Hinisho (chief medical official in Alberta) is not even involved as a contribution or as a person comments on the report – she leads all decisions taken in Alberta. Conway asked:” How can you write a report on what happened in Alberta without Dina Hinsho. “
The critics of the Alberta government Covid-19 team indicate that the former chief medical health officials, Dr. Dina Hinisho, who headed the response to the province, was not even met to prepare the report.
Global news
“Some of the main decision makers, who are not in the government, but even within the government, they will not speak to the business squad because I think they felt – and they are right – that things were already stacked against them,” Mount said. Professor of political science at the Royal University, d. Duan Prat.
“I think this is what happened here. Dr. Lenora Saksger said:” As if it was a group of people who have been chosen, and those who are already known in the public domain are that they have extremist or marginal opinions about things like vaccination and things like, as you know, restrictions, and restrictions Public Health, “Infectious Diseases Specialist from Alberta University.
Get weekly health news
Get the latest medical news and health information that you receive every Sunday.
The report consists of 269 pages and contains a long list of grievances related to the boycott response to the epidemic.
Among the results of the report and its recommendations:
- She says that Alberta should refrain from imposing in future masks to respiratory diseases because “there is no benefit from hiding individuals who do not have symptoms,” and indicates possible damage to concealment, such as self -pollution, discomfort, and a good sense of safety. “
- He criticizes the use of closure to control the spread of the disease, saying: “The strictly non -pharmaceutical measures had a small relative effect on the growth of infection.”
- She says that rapid, reasonable tests should not be used to examine the general population and “responses to the epidemic in the future should not be given priority to reduce severe diseases and deaths at the expense of widespread detection of cases.”
- It encourages the herd or “immunity acquired from the infection” that it says is “well understood” – and the recovered individuals during the Athenian plague in 430 BC “did not be attacked in the same way twice – and they were not killed at all.”
- She says that there must be more protection for the doctor’s right to prescribe the medicine and the pharmacist’s ability to promote alternative treatments such as Evermctin and hydroxy chlorocin, which, in their professional judgment, is in the interest of the patient; and,
- The Alberta government recommends an immediate cessation of the use of all Kofid -19 vaccines without a full disclosure of patients regarding safety and effectiveness issues by their doctor, saying based on the evidence that has emerged so far – most of which have been provided by vaccine manufacturers. -“It cannot be concluded that the Kofid-19 vaccines are safe.”
Among the recommendations of the work team is that the Alberta government immediately stops using all Kovid-19 vaccines because, based on the evidence that has emerged so far, “it cannot be concluded that these vaccines are safe.”
Global news
““This is completely dangerous,” said Dr. Conway. “He talks about the fact that we neglected natural immunity – hybrid immunity. We did not. This has been part of the messages from a very early time. It talks about the ineffectiveness of the vaccine. It is very effective. Before publishing the initial experiments report for clinical experiments, we mentioned that the effectiveness of these experiments by 50 percent will be very important – but it was more than 80 percent.
“It takes a lot of information completely outside the context,” Konway said. “So it is surprising for me to reach a document of this type to the Prime Minister’s office and have any credibility.”
The University of Alberta, infection specialist, Dr. Lenora Saksgerger, describes the report of the Alberta Government’s business as an “attempt to rewrite history.”
Global news
Dr. Saksgerger describes the report as an attempt to “rewrite history.”
“I have a colleague who was actually a member of our scientific advisory group and is included as a shareholder and has already asked to withdraw his name.”
“If you take it seriously, it will really question everything that happened during the epidemic, and I do not think that people should do this,” Saxger added. “If you assume that the result of these recommendations will be closer to the American approach – there would be, as you know, 15,000 deaths in Alberta – and this is much more than we have already seen.”
Speaking in an audio broadcast in Alberta on Friday, the head of the work team, Dr. Davidson, defended the research methods followed by the committee, saying: “There is no such thing as a consensus in science – and this has no meaning – science revolves around skepticism about everything, and an experience And improve whether it is true or not … this is science.
In a statement by Global News, the Minister of Health in Alberta, Adriana Ligrang, said that “the Alberta government will review and look at this report and its results, however, no political decisions have been taken regarding it at this time,” said Adriana Ligrang.
& Copy 2025 Global News, one of Corus Entertainment Inc.