Do you want to sacrifice the little people’s lifestyle in order to respond to the hassles of the urban environment? – Irev Europe
Points of view expressed in opinion pieces are strictly those of the author and do not reflect anything editorially relevant.
Posted on January 22, 2025
–
A
+
“What kind of candidacy are there in the clopes and which run in diesel?” This is the phrase in which Benjamin Griveaux, of complete sincerity, says that he was late for an interview and that he was greatly disadvantaged. This little phrase is pronounced ce fils de notaire diplômé de Science Po Paris, illustre le mépris d’une a certain class of officials about les «petites gens» who do not rent more in the modern world, ouvert and «inclusif» tel qu’on voudrait construction .
Les Français aisés des metropoles that speak English and have benéficient des “mobilités douces”, live désormais dans a different world of cells in French that are native to the imense national territory. There are two worlds that are not repeated more often and are not known more.
People who “shoot clothes and move diesel” inhabit a heritage house or pavilion located in the city centre. They come together among friends having a barbecue and pouring a glass of wine or a pastry to share in the joy of friendship in terms of making up or rejecting the world. Young people will start chasing or going on a bike ride as they prepare for the next stage. This is their first time camping and living in a family car, so a diesel car is best.
The city, outside the world, lives in capital cities and travels by bicycle, via electric roads or shared transportation. Jeune et sans enfant, ou jeune Parent Socialement integrated, il Part Easy on the weekend in a European capital to visit exceptional exhibitions and go at night to a concert or to a sub-disco. For your vacation, you will spend time on a trip to Thailand, New York or Dubai to learn the tourist sites, benefit from a lecture about sunny beaches, and buy products outside of taxes in ultra-modern “malls”. These urban commuters have been popping up for a couple of decades in a number of countries allowing them to disrupt life for the sake of consumption. They show a typical “ultra-rich” or influencer following on social networks. This cosmopolitan lifestyle is made possible by products manufactured in large quantities in China and low cost to tourist destinations.
The world can move forward like this without encombre mais voilà qu’il faut save the planet!
Countless spontaneously declared experts and guys from business or engineering schools decided to take on a problem. They are embarking on RSE endeavors and also fighting for penetration. Commit souvent lorsqu’on œuvre pour le Bien, due to coercive and punitive measures… of others.
The young people’s lifestyle is also stigmatized by these young fighters because mass tourism, digital consumption and urban materials have become so outdated. Beef steak and sauce are more polluting than Bitcoin mining, trips to Dubai, and electric cars.
The Ruraux’s modest lifestyle is simple and financially enforced because digital activities or flights are not infrequent (kerosene is not taxed). Bear! The price of electricity includes its daily uses for some reason, some irregular energy policies, as well as the acquisition of energy for new needs that were developed without these things: electric cars, digital uses, er…
L’IA and cryptocurrencies alone need electrical centers to supply their electricity needs (more than light carbon), and data centers are able to get so hot that they move to the cold desert of Norway or Groeneland. Instead of inquiring about these new uses for GES drives, ONG and wired media are the way of life for young people. Modifying their eating habits, changing car, heating, windows, washing machine… requires taxation, prohibition or stigma.
Attacks against campaigns and agriculture do not stop GES emissions. Ecologists try to inculcate the idea that molecules characteristic of animals (drugs, antibiotics) and plants (phytosanitary) are toxins responsible for the diseases of historical civilization (cancer, infertility, Alzheimer’s disease…).
Massive campaigns to find glyphosate and OGM were the banner of this point. Throw in the untold scientific studies on these topics and the measures to exonerate consumers as environmentalists, as NGOs and the media put pressure on policies that vote on laws to prevent them. These methods of innovative production are not more accessible to European and French farmers, agriculture is not more competitive and is not offered more by consensus. (See Mercosur)
However, in 2023, glyphosate was again classified as non-carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic by the European Food Security Agency (EFSA).
Regarding OGM, in the present day, 30 years after the first generations of OGM were revisited, there is a risk to humans and to animals of such a high level that it cannot be distinguished. The only study conducted with OGM in charge is the Seralini sur Le Maïs OGM NK 603 study. This study, which was mediated across all media, was of “inadequate scientific quality.” In 2013, the then-published Journal of Food and Chemical Toxicology was sadly retired.
Massive precautionary measures have been implemented against the agricultural trait molecules market (Directive No. 128/2009) which has helped NGOs in their fight against modern agriculture and land economy support. They drip a chemical into society, without providing prior information and mixing all information that is sorted into context.
It is a development of moyens, not to achieve advances in production that allow reducing food prices or improving quality, but in order to search for additional rare present molecules in products or raw materials (packaging or denrées agricoles). In addition, the crises of bisphenol A, titanium dioxide, nitrites, and PFAS… do not linger in the face of disturbing media and scandals.
The constant search for endless risks is a European sport because inflation reduces the access to food of an important part of the population.
The irony is that this invisible molecule accompanies something similar to the acceptance of cannabis in Europe, practically without the effects on health being clearly defined.
It is time to sort out the incoherence and stop responding to the orders of NGO ecologists. Public goals must return to the light of scientific and real-world data that is interesting for the entire population: food that is accessible to citizens and a rural economy that thrives on competitiveness.