Culture in Danger – Jean-Baptiste Noé, “How Humanity Lives!” » – IREF Europe

Who says humanity does not serve Real? Jean-Baptiste Noé noted its fundamental role and importance in our society and our freedoms.

This will open in this place in this series. In fact, we live in an era and a world of technologies that are likely to be all, or all, intended to travel towards a better future through the promises of the meddling side of artificial intelligence and the bleak desire of the present and the tyranny of transformation. Humanity is a useful tool, it requires a lot. What can serve him in a practical plan and in relation to the actions that he can consider?

Can I imagine a world without repetition? Does a company without references want to reinvent all the mistakes or reproduce similar mistakes made previously by cells? In a time of the woes of vigilante movements, it is very helpful to ask these questions and ask whether humanity is necessary.

Humanity in the heart of the city

Can we imagine a world without literature, without philosophy, without historical or geographical memories, or that letters are not useful for vertical books, as they contain the basics and their ability to think and learn knowledge? They draw on these different disciplines of basic experience and culture, in which we provide the basics for life in society and which underlie our value and, indeed, our freedom.

Because it is the culture, the transmission, the experiences that are forgotten – or do not affect their existence – that allow an understanding of the world that is only immediately practical or scientific.

“Since the positivism of the nineteenth century, Jean-Baptiste Noé wrote, everything that is not scientific is because it is not serious, is useless, will become useless. This always raises the debate about utilitarianism, which is an absurd debate because the human benefit is great.”

Transmission is essential. This is what ensures the continuity of generations, the acquisition of knowledge, and the cement of civilization. “Humanities is a threefold work of life: it does not live by actions, by what it transmits, and by what it receives. It doesn’t exist in the don and in the change; It is a treasure that is not transferred and shared in nature in order not to see or create dans la poussière de l’oubli. Curieux trésor en effet, which croît au fur et à mesure qu’il est donné, which se dissout il n’est pas échangé.”

Reason versus ignorance and the culture of myself

The obsession with mathematics also leads contemporary structuralists to begin to introduce part of them. And that’s just in the economy, out, as we did before. It is quite clear that this is an endeavor of the spirit and logos that leads to a scientific endeavour, not mathematics as you say.

When this is not the case Emotions that present themselves to reason. Tendance of more and more in the number of domains aujourd’hui. Enforcement in l’ignorance, les peurs irrationnelles, le culte du moi. Instead of privileging resources, it enhances humanity. We also give our best to resist the surrounding demagoguery.

In addition to awareness, in addition to getting rid of the horizon line of our ignorance. This can be a parvois döner le fertig: it cannot be a jamais, berries lère, berries conner, berries mitris, berries savoir. It is a duty to choose, although painful, to limit yourself to a few pieces that can work.

As Jean-Baptiste Noé wrote, “The new humanism offers us the life that allows us to see the world in which we live immersed, donc de vivre avec loui.” Mieux encore, “pouvoir s’appuyer sur des personnes qui savent lire le monde, comme sait lire un paysage, est basic pour une city é ordonnée.”

It is, in fact, a culture of collective participation that allows the creation of privileges, and allows a community of its own to exchange, participate and favor dialogue between individuals from other countries and cultures. The humanities are “the community of city life.”

Humanity and democracy

Literature plays an essential role in democracy, as it acquires a sense of the social state, where society is founded on law and is opposed to authoritarian centralism. It is a source of expansion, a means of protection against dictatorships and of overcoming the natural tent of voluntary slavery.

An additional question that brings reality to the existence of a digital creator and the risks of the entertainment company.

Demagoguery that says it is good in the heat of emotions, overpowers people, arouses emotions, and finds more citizens to test what voters do in the political and cultural sphere. Humanism is a stand for oppression, tyranny, and the reduction of man to the state of being. Men who use TikTok can easily gain more dictator style politicians. A reason that cannot be a reason to avoid democracy without humanity.

Milan Kundera was obsessed with the ability of resistance to oppress all, which elevates humanity to the realm of the primary source of consciences. It is difficult to say that it is rare to destroy books, erase authors, and prevent reflection on emerging revolutions. Spirit formation, intellectual conformity, and correct policy are the enemies of democracy. The only antidote lies in humanity.”

We were helped to develop les vertus, force was also called for, by Jean-Baptiste Noé, who restored the sense of courage, and Alexander Solzhenitsyn did not assert that we are in decline in the West, also perverted. Our freedoms, mines by the United Nations The commitment we deny is correcting complexity in favor of simplification, caricatured visions, ideologies and demagogy.

Jean-Baptiste Noé, Welcome to humanity!Pauline, November 2024, 78 pages.

_________

Read more:

• Culture in Danger (1) – George Steiner, The Silence of Books
• Culture in Danger (2) – George Steiner, Ceux qui brûlent les livres
• Culture in Danger (3) – Charles Dantzig, Porquois’ Novel?
• Culture in Danger (4) – Jacqueline Killeen, The Spirit of Solitude
• Culture in Danger (5) – Collectif La Main Invisible, Libres!!
• Culture in Danger (6) – Alain Finkielkraut, L’après littérature
• Culture in Danger (7) – Tzvetan Todorov, Literature in Danger
• Culture in Danger (8) – Christine Sorgin, The Mirage of Contemporary Art
• Culture in Danger (9) – Patrice Jean, La poursuite de l’idéal
• Culture in Danger (10) – Antoine Compagnon, Literature for What Is Work?
• Culture in Danger (11) – Justine Ogier, Kruer: On the Possibilities of Literature
• Culture in Danger (12) – Michel Desmorget, Faites-les Lire!
• Culture in Danger (13) – Joseph Roth, L’autodafé de l’esprit
• Culture in Danger (14) – Milan Kundera, Abduction of the West
• Culture in Danger (15) – Mario Vargas Llosa, lecture poem and fiction
• Culture in Danger (16) – Philip Nimmo, “The Crisis of Culture? »
• Culture in Danger (17) – Salman Rushdie, “Le couteau”
• Culture in Danger (18) – George Orwell, “Some of us, what is so discordant with us?” »