Oscar scandals are now an inevitable part of the award season.
The suggestions mention that the man dated a “beautiful mind” Make anti -Semitic insults For colleagues? Or recently, how Bravura turns from Adrien Brody “The Brutalist” got the batch of Amnesty International?
This scandal is different, and the timing cannot be worse for an industry staring at the cultural abyss. Classics of the ceremony may be the least academic problems after Gascóngate.
The masses may finally raise an Oscar night as a cultural institution.
Even without the scandal that now flooded Emilia Perez, Kitty Rich and the critic of the Atlantic movie Davidlsims I can only wonder whether Netflix of everything has affected the perception of the movie. Full conversation: pic.twitter.com/gq44qbg0yg
– Thenkler) February 8, 2025
The first part of the scandal is less explosive but more harmful in the big picture. The Netflix Music “Emilia Pérez” got huge 13 Oscar nominations last month. This is more than some loved films in all ages.
Think of the “Godfather”, “Al -Bur Al -Mustarab” and “Citizen Kane”. HECK, only three films got more than 13 filters – “All About Eve”, “La La Land” and “Titanic”. (All of them were 14 gestures)
The French Karl Sofía Gascón, which is undergoing a non -profit, is eager to start a new life.
The film has not been born a kind of comprehensive praise that may explain the crushing of nominations. Film 72 percent of the “fresh” spoiled tomato points It tells part of the story. This “corrupt” rating of 17 percent (and the fall) of consumers is hinting at something deeper.
Why is the movie that contains less glowing reviews are given a lot of nominations? Oscar quickly provided some answers. The progressive spirit of the film, from the formation of the protagonist (cross) to the feminist complaints broadcast by the co -star Zoe Saldana, made it miserable for the voters.
Both sides of the ideological passage agreed on change.
eagle:
Voting in favor of Emilia Perez, and nomination [Karla Sofia] Gascón for the best actress in particular, they felt that they were taking a position against the Trump administration’s efforts to erase the sexual identity. Although it was a long shot to win its category, Gascón became ACE in the hole. Regardless of what anyone else said, there was a passing woman who could speak credible about Emilia Perez as a light lighthouse in the dark.
John Nolte at Breitbart.com:
With 73 percent of corrupt tomato critics and 17 percent audience points, it is not a secret that the merit has nothing to do with the 13th Oscar nominations.
Remember merit? Are voters Oscar?
Once again, art policy slowed on Oscar. Perhaps he has never been some years ago, but not in 2025. President Donald Trump, with Ruby Starbock and Kristover Rovo, has shredded this like many dice documents.
This cultural tide is the laundry at the award ceremony this year. The fans are already suspected that politics is highly weighing in the minds of the voters in the academy before “Emilia Perez”. This amazing number of nomination has strengthened those concerns.
This was in front of the journalist “appearing” old tweets and problems in Gascón. The transient artist, one of five Oscar actresses, overwhelmed social media.
Some quick examples:
Islam is wonderful, without any mechanism. Women are respected, and when they are largely respected, they are left with a small square hole on their faces so that their eyes are visible and their mouths, but only if they act. Although they wear clothes this way in order to enjoy them. How disgusting of humanity. “
“I really think that a few people took care of George Floyd, who is addicted to drugs, but his death has once again worked to prove that there are people who still consider black monkeys without rights and the policemen are considered killers … they are” all the mistake. “
The reaction to these messages was quickly and not softening. The old press, which may reduce a scandal suffering from a progressive star, went to the battle. The fire caught fire and has not yet cool.
The director “Emilia Perez” Jack Odiad Jaskoun threw under the bus. Likewise, with Saldana, I sensed the best supporter chances of the supporter might explode.
Now, Gascón is going on a silent radio in the hope of not staining “Emilia Perez” more.
Netflix stopped communicating directly with Karl Sofía Gascón and will not cover any expenses for her travel during the award season, @diverse Reports.
The actress will have to pay for everything from her highness to future accommodations. pic.twitter.com/bm5tslgszp
POP CRAVE (POPOPCRAVE) February 4, 2025
It is impossible to ignore the Karmiya angle. I watched Hollywood Bassem The cancellation of culture destroyed the entertainment industry. The stars stood beside the predators (Harvey Winstein) and the siblings of Roseanne Barr alike, witnessing their professions exploding.
They chanted the first and let the latter happen without a response.
Today, the cancellation culture appears to be receded, but it is still strong enough to download Oscar hopes in Gascón.
The third issue that Emilia Perez has afflicted the most difficult desire. Film writer Giancarlo Sobo noticed the amount of musical error regarding Mexican culture. This is not a slight quibbles obtained from the second or third viewing.
barely. Subo’s article highlighted the linguistic screaming of the film, as cultural errors indicate that film makers did not make their homework.
They failed to break books, to be nice. that it Final diversity failed.
Even the songs of the Academy Award film. For example, “Mi Camino” includes harsh and unnatural signals to “Séptimo Cielo”, a literal and vital translation of “Seventh Heaven”, an expression of Angelofone that is not found in Spanish. “El Mal” suffers from similar issues, with lines such as “LOS Llevan Affura …” – A direct presentation of “they take them out” when the original speakers say “Los Sakan …”
The academy that has expanded the voting gathering yet “Oscospohit” campaign,, Failing to get rid of these flagrant errors. This is another black eye for the brand.
Where does this leave the Academy Awards?
Related: Stephen King – Canceling the Oscars
The Foundation has previously affected its case by demanding the requirements of diversity for the best pictures of photos. The liberal stars ceremony allowed anger against the governors shown after the show, as it chases the viewers of the red states.
Most likely for good.
Academy rented the comedy actor on the far left, Jimmy Kimmel to host the show for several years, enhancing baked biases in the show.
Is there a shock to see the event categories? Reducing over the years?
Even the so -called Oscar is frequently happening. I once watched the films the box office wealth rises after implementation.
now? Most films are already available for broadcasting and others see modest gains.
The ceremony has participated in other body strikes in recent years. the “La La Land” / “MoonLight” Best Shopping Image He rushes to mind. This is how Will Smith hit the show presenter Chris Rock in the middle of the show, just to accept the best Oscar actor minutes later.
The March 2 ceremonies should have been an opportunity to restore this Oscar. Jack Nicholson may have broke his retirement and gave fans a wave of front row.
Who does not like to see that?
This year’s host, Conan Operation, is less political than Kimmel or other modern Emcees. La Wilfires has destroyed the industry in recent weeks. Most of the night will be devoted to honoring local firefighters and a pledge to rebuild the angels.
This feeling can attract some viewers hesitating to the ceremony. Good faith.
Instead, we will remember that the most nominated movie at night mainly cuts the line for ideological reasons.
Worse scenario? The collected stars have turned Oscar’s night into the Resistancetm Theater, chasing anyone who is considered a voice for Trump.
The editor’s note: It is a brutal time to be an independent journalist, but it was never necessary given the unfortunate state of corporate press. If you enjoy Hollywood at Toto, I hope you think about leaving a currency (or two) in us Tip jar.
